It seems that the advantages of tolerance are indisputable, because so many people cannot work otherwise on its development, upbringing and maintenance. Worldwide congresses and teachers of schools - everyone talks about this, but it is worth understanding in more detail the consequences of this phenomenon.
Advantages of tolerance in maintaining humanity and avoiding violent collisions. This ability allows you to learn to overcome difficult situations and your own fears through effective interactions and the search for common interests - this usually leads to the exchange of experience and the emergence of something completely new, impossible without combining different ideas from different people. This is an endless transfer of experience and knowledge, the ability to draw information and a new look at the world. In addition to the informative pleasures, tolerance contributes to their own peace of mind and development, because you can be nervous because of the differences for an infinitely long time, get a breakdown and go to a psychiatric hospital, which also does not save from internal beliefs that interfere with living in society. Without experiencing irritation or hatred of any people, we get more places to turn for help, imbued with different views on the same situation, and this is what helps to find new and right solutions.
Tolerance cons also exist, because, like any idea, it has its own blind spots and weak points. Often, taking advantage of the ideas of developing tolerance, hiding behind good ideas and intentions, people manipulate others. It is fair at the country level and the introduction into the consciousness of some idea, and at the level of personal interaction and pumping out obliging behavior from others. After all, in order not to seem intolerable and low, we strive to take care, and some use it. It involves a subtle sense of the edge, when you really treat a person with respect, and when you give in to manipulation, it is not easy. In addition, some manifestations of tolerance look like indifference. Of course, it is worthwhile to let the person decide his own fate and make elections, but if the mother just sits and watches her child drug in Vienna, this is not tolerance, but stupidity.
Probably, the main disadvantages of tolerance are that a good idea was distorted by bad senses, that which should come from the heart began to be demanded and gnawed, besides the widespread slogans from which one would like to ask only "Why can't one do good things quieter?". A lot of manipulations and cover-up by this concept of far from ethical things have developed an attitude towards it as a manipulation in order to abandon one's own interests. But it is worth remembering that this is a mutual, bilateral, sincere and ongoing process.